Property sales in CW5 5 postcode sector - page 62 Cheshire East

This is a map and list of properties recently sold in the CW5 5 postcode sector in the UK covering the areas of Nantwich, Willaston, Cheshire East, based on the records of the Land Registry

AddressTypeDatePrice
41 Tyldesley Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UENew build flat (leasehold)Oct 2005£119,500
56 Capel Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UGNew build terraced (leasehold)Oct 2005£207,100
18 Sutton Close, Nantwich, CW5 5GFTerraced (leasehold)Oct 2005£223,000
New build terraced (leasehold)May 2003£174,950
14 Millstone Lane, Nantwich, CW5 5PDTerraced (freehold)Oct 2005£110,000
10 Clough Court, Nantwich, CW5 5GLNew build flat (leasehold)Oct 2005£114,995
74 North Crofts, Nantwich, CW5 5SQTerraced (freehold)Oct 2005£134,000
Terraced (freehold)Jun 1999£45,000
22 St Lawrence Court, Nantwich, CW5 5PBDetached (freehold)Oct 2005£190,000
Detached (freehold)Oct 1999£78,000
Detached (freehold)Aug 1999£82,000
The Annexe, 108 Welsh Row, Nantwich, CW5 5EYDetached (freehold)Oct 2005£355,000
7 The Beeches, Nantwich, CW5 5YPSemi-detached (freehold)Sep 2005£145,000
34 Taylor Drive, Nantwich, CW5 5GGNew build semi-detached (freehold)Sep 2005£177,995
47 Barony Court, Nantwich, CW5 5RDFlat (leasehold)Sep 2005£86,000
46 Lambert Crescent, Nantwich, CW5 5UHNew build terraced (leasehold)Sep 2005£149,995
24 Millfields, Nantwich, CW5 5HSDetached (freehold)Sep 2005£270,000
10 Carter Close, Nantwich, CW5 5GDNew build semi-detached (leasehold)Sep 2005£185,995
87 Tyldesley Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UENew build flat (leasehold)Aug 2005£146,750
14 Meeanee Drive, Nantwich, CW5 5JGDetached (freehold)Aug 2005£180,000
Detached (freehold)Nov 2002£102,500
1 Morgan Walk, Nantwich, CW5 5UQTerraced (leasehold)Aug 2005£165,000
New build terraced (leasehold)Aug 2003£142,950
Apartment 42, Cromwell Court, Beam Street, Nantwich, CW5 5NZFlat (leasehold)Aug 2005£118,000
35 Tyldesley Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UENew build flat (leasehold)Aug 2005£135,800
59 Lambert Crescent, Nantwich, CW5 5UHNew build flat (leasehold)Aug 2005£128,995
47 Lambert Crescent, Nantwich, CW5 5UHNew build flat (leasehold)Aug 2005£128,995
73 Lambert Crescent, Nantwich, CW5 5UHNew build flat (leasehold)Jul 2005£123,995
177 Queens Drive, Nantwich, CW5 5JJSemi-detached (freehold)Jul 2005£155,000
9 Pratchitts Row, Nantwich, CW5 5SBTerraced (freehold)Jul 2005£100,000
32 Capel Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UGNew build terraced (leasehold)Jul 2005£182,400
61 Lambert Crescent, Nantwich, CW5 5UHNew build flat (leasehold)Jul 2005£128,995
67 Lambert Crescent, Nantwich, CW5 5UHFlat (leasehold)Jul 2005£113,995
71 Tyldesley Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UENew build flat (leasehold)Jul 2005£146,750
81 Tyldesley Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UEFlat (leasehold)Jul 2005£122,800
84 Queens Drive, Nantwich, CW5 5JHSemi-detached (freehold)Jul 2005£154,500
25 Gibson Close, Nantwich, CW5 5UNTerraced (leasehold)Jul 2005£180,000
New build terraced (leasehold)Mar 2004£199,995
29 Lambert Crescent, Nantwich, CW5 5UHNew build flat (leasehold)Jul 2005£113,995
26 Capel Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UGNew build terraced (leasehold)Jun 2005£195,900
43 Lambert Crescent, Nantwich, CW5 5UHNew build flat (leasehold)Jun 2005£126,995
45 Lambert Crescent, Nantwich, CW5 5UHNew build flat (leasehold)Jun 2005£117,995
45 Tyldesley Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UENew build flat (leasehold)Jun 2005£141,100
49 Lambert Crescent, Nantwich, CW5 5UHNew build flat (leasehold)Jun 2005£128,995
49 Tyldesley Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UENew build flat (leasehold)Jun 2005£146,750
67 Tyldesley Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UENew build flat (leasehold)Jun 2005£141,100
69 Tyldesley Way, Nantwich, CW5 5UENew build flat (leasehold)Jun 2005£146,750

Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2025. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Notes

The average price shown is the geometric mean which multiplies all sales prices together then takes the square root. This should reduce the impact of sales of very expensive houses.
No adjustments are made for seasonal variations, so average prices will not match the Land Registry's own figures
Sales in the final month are always lower than earlier months, due to that month's data not being complete.